Also, no other creature has breasts but human females i.e. animals or even monkeys don't have them BECAUSE: those fatty mammal glands were enlarged by men through selection. Men selected females with larger breasts thinking to better feed their children and better aroousal characteristics, none of which is true, small breasts are as excitable as large ones and in fact oversized breasts turn into oversized problem for their owner with age oftean leading to cancer (too much biombutt that's not used in mdoern civilization to feed babies as we buy all possible crap in supermarkets). Anyway, females came out with larger and larger boobs and now we have human breasts not found in the animal world. Men's muscels is a different story: in a modern technocratic civilization created also by MEN, abstract intelligence is more impirtant and so men reduced in size and their physical qualities faded, just look at out forbears huge bodies and biceps and compare to a modern city skinny nervous guy in a shirt spending all day punching buttons or sitting in trains, cars, etc instead of running for food (hunting). Plus, processed food we eat today contains much more estrogen-like hormones comparing to historic past. So men's biology moved towards female, while female became even more female. The homoloveual desease is not physical, it's socio-psychological, more Lesbioans doesn't mean women became privatesheads, no, it's only due to mugh higher tolerqance towards homos, so anything goes and they think it's ok to be Gay-lesbian. The point of my post is to show women's breasts are unique in the biological world, if you as any sensible person believe in the Creation-Creator (call it God, Jesus, Jqahveh, Allah, Shiva WHATEVER) they were gioven to uis from the start, yes I agree, I am just saying they were further "enhanced" by men-induced selection which favored women with more profound breats from generation to generation making it more and more proinounced.
|
