Do you understand what a "comparison" is? Truly? The terms in a comparison are not going to be the same as the terms in the original. That's why none of the comparisons were based on loveual orientation. They're comparisons using other things. That's how comparisons work. What I was demonstrating, quite clearly, is that the statement "We can survive as a species without X. Therefore X contributes nothing in the scheme of mankind." is FALSE. It's false when X is priests, novelists, physicists, and musicians. Therefore we have no reason to believe it's true when X is anything else, like homoloveuals, unless additional evidence is provided. You provided none. Your statement is FALSE. The Truth About Jews 1215They also dominated the "feminist" gang. The "why" of the matter is very simple- POWER. Winston Smith in 1984 couldn't understand... Red herring, sleight of hand, change of subject. Good work. I don't have an adopted loveual orientation. And I don't have any particular interest in changing society so that most people are bi or gay. I'm perfectly happy living in a society where the vast majority of people are straight, as long as they treat gays with respect. What I was saying was your statement that society would end if we didn't have heteroloveuals is FALSE. Such a society would continue just fine, because homoloveuals can have and raise children just fine. I'm not suggesting we create such or society, and I don't see any way - or reason - to do so. Giving gays equal rights won't create a society of all gays (although, for some reason, some anti-gay bigots seem to think it would - they must not have much faith in heteroloveuality). However, as I demoonstrated, your statement is FALSE. You really do love your false claims, don't you? They're the only way you can go on bashing gays.
|
