Grizzlie Antagonist Run at year's to "equalizer" beaten can't Well, I don't think it would take much to look profound compared to you but that's another story. Why indeed should I care what you believe? You leaped to the defense of a poster attacking women in a relatively stupid manner. That doesn't make you exactly a paragon of manhood either. wrote Aww poor baby. Sorry but I must buttume that he's a big boy and can defend himself. You are someone who just can't help leap to someone else's defense when someone else makes a comment about his post. Pretty pathetic. Feel free. the Wrong, as usual. It's called light amusement. That's why I do usenet. Are you under the impression that your posts are worth taking seriously? say. I can tell you don't teach school. Good thing as well since I certainly wouldn't want my child going to a teacher as inaccurate as you. that Impressively stupid. Challenging the masculinity of someone who attacks women rather stupidly by misrepresenting an article which he publishes does not equate to racial invective, persons threats, or information on how to build an atomic plant. I don't make person threats, I leave that to persons and would be persons. I don't use racist invective because it is mindless and stupid as well as ignorant. I do know the concepts of how to build an atomic plant but I certainly wouldn't publish them here or anywhere else and that's the concepts, not the details, which I don't know or care to know. But none of the above are in the same clbutt or type of thing as your complaint about my original comments. Yet another silly comment. Think of it as light amusement. Sorry idiot. I know men can run faser than women. Castigating women for it however is potentially revealing about their love life.
|
