you I checked out this source of yours. It was written in 1998. Pure, unadulterated bullpoo. Not even a thinly veiled attempt at objectivity or reporting any facts. Absolutely nothing but propaganda. No wonder you like it. TO expose your adoration for bullpoo, let's reprint the very first paragraph of the piece which, amazingly, you neglected to do, perhaps because it exposes what a complete bullpoo fraud piece this really is. (Again, no wonder you like it.) "Rudolph Giuliani is a dangerous man. This may sound like a bizarre statement about a popular mayor with significant bipartisan support, and one who is perceived as having the right stuff to combat crime in New York City. But Giuliani's personality contains a mixture of elements which will inevitably explode. He is rigid, extremely self-righteous, and has no sense of humor. There is not a touch of self-deprecation anywhere in him; he has no idea of his own flaws. Add a gallon of ambition and you have a Molotov chickentail." Any journalistic methodology there? Any at all? Any attempt at telling facts? No. All bullpoo empty rhetoric? Yes. The Village Voice. Are you really trying to pawn this off as a real news source? And Russell Baker? You also forgot to mention that the piece was written in December of 1993. Your ability to stay current is fascinating. politics. Again, you neglected to include the lead paragraph. "Patrolman Phil Caruso and lawyer Richard Hartman built the Patrolmen's Benevolent buttociation into an arrogant, insular, and wealthy insbreastution that stands above the law and beyond scrutiny. Where is the $63 million a year in tax funds and union dues going? Only their friends know for sure." So we have unsubstantiated charges of theft and slander (again) about Mr. Giuliani. Destroying your non-existent credibility is way too easy. Did anybody happen to catch the name of he site? Socialist Action. Need anything more be said? Clearly you show your true colors. And did I mention destroying your non-existent credibility? This is actually from "Workers World" published in 1998. Again as timely as you can find bullpoo published pieces on, and from another openly socialist publication. Nothing illegal about being a socialist. But you've never been so blatant about it before. Explains a lot of things about you and why you lie in your posts all the time. Another socialist publication from an organization whose avowed goal is to "eliminate the great inequalities of wealth and power in our society, " No free market society for these people! They are self proclaimed "professionals, activists, academics, and students" dedicated to "fundamental change in our political and economic systems." Sounds like they are clearly against a free and open society and advocate a more regulated society free of that pesky freedom and individual rights stuff. This piece is written by the editor of the socialist propoganda site above, "Planners Network." A highly academically credentialled professional activist and chronic protestor... of just about anything that makes society work. His bio says he taught at the graduate level at SUNY, Columbia University, Harvard, and University of California at Berkeley. One wonders why he's now stuck at Hunter College which is not exactly of the stature of some of the other insbreastutions he mentions. This bullpoo piece is undated and certainly cannot be considered unbiased or credible. Relying on any of these ridiculous sources is like asking you to take the work of Jerry Falwell or Rush Limbaugh as gospel. At least Limbaugh (last time I listened to him about a gazillion years ago), would skewer his political opponents by using clips or quotes of their own words. Kinda like how I huimiliate you. Interesting. So clearly, you and your cites-sites are worthless.
|
