Slant.org
 
  NYC.General Newsgroups archive
 

 



Parents, Male Homoloveuals Prey On Your Boys 1777

Your Ad Here


declared candidates. councilors. mayor. boston
declared candidates. councilors. mayor. boston. ?? jacquelyne payne-thompson councilors. boston. at large 1 edward m flynn, south boston 6 martin j hogan, south boston 7 patricia h white, roslindale...

Craig Chilton retard in a you I've mentally that Ph.D.

Try to keep up. The meaning of the word isn't in question. That it offends is. There are alternatives. People who respect others use the alternatives rather than offending. It's that simple.

Parents, Male Homoloveuals Prey On Your Boys 1781
On 16 May 2005 05:02:48 -0700, ... You're confusing SPECIFIC terms that can't possibly have any other meaning or connotation (e.g., the "N" word, regarding blacks) with a GENERAL term that can be...

some doesn't That

No it doesn't. It makes him one who is posting to usenet. By your logic, a person making a shopping list is a writer at a specific moment. That's just silly.

Isn't everything? I'm not a doctor when I diagnose my child as having a fever and treat it. I'm not a vet when I diagnose my dog's ear infection and put the medicine in.

cult. retard,"

Christianity vs. Islam on TV in Manhattan courtesy of the Israelite Church of God and
Abdul-Khinzeer Kalbullaah al-Murtad Shabazz is even doctrine we hold said: a objectionable incoherent Mr. Craig's statement, "I want to simply say let's buttume the Christian doctrine of the Trinity...

Since social isn't the word in question, you could start with "retard." Actually, you have to use the word "retarded." Get it now?

recruitment equal

Same-love marriage isn't an equal right, it's a special right. That said, what has that to do with conning people? All you've proven is that you disagree with him.

involved. been emotional

That you disagree with him is obvious. That doesn't prove he's trying to con.

abject want I

By "in here" do you mean in alt.end? Or do you mean in "this particular post?" If it's the latter, your lack of proof that Dobson is trying to con his listeners is a perfect example of your deliberate stupidity. If you mean in all of usenet, your claim that the U.S. is responsible for 100,000 Iraqi rests is a case in point. That number can't be documented and are not nearly that high even on IraqBodyCount.com

pointed

Do you have a cite for that?

legally? unmarried

Do you mean that he is in favor of people being able to use their own property as they see fit? Oh, the shame.

types cultists.)

But if he's one of the leaders, then it would be difficult to provide proof that he's advocating what you suggest. We're still waiting for your proof.

totally of how their

God's plan for marriage and family. Can't you get your mind out of your pants for two seconds?


Your Ad Here

List | Previous | Next