Slant.org
 
  NYC.General Newsgroups archive
 

 



Parents, Male Homoloveuals Prey On Your Boys 1764

Your Ad Here


Parents, Male Homoloveuals Prey On Your Boys 1767
On 18 May 2005 07:14:06 -0700, Wrong. Marriage is marriage, and the Consbreastution contains NO restrictions pertaining to gender composition of...

Craig Chilton

the

I will call it what it is.

over to either. RRR surprise;

I guess not.

you've

RRR without have that

They already have the same rights. They are seeking rights that no one else has either. That means they are seeking special rights. Do you understand that?

IOW, anyone who has an opinion that differs from your own must be lying.

Parents, Male Homoloveuals Prey On Your Boys 1765
On 23 May 2005 05:44:24 -0700, Call it that if you want. But the reality is that you were boring everyone to rest with inane romps down...

who are of

Why? It's just more of the same.

significant remain

That's your proof?

Then please have at it. Document it. Provide a cite.

Or stop single

Now you understand.

publicly it

Still waiting.....

you

Your inability to answer a simple question or prove any of your allegations is noted.

religious

Then Dobson is a defender of personal liberties and he is very pro-choice. And, although I haven't listened to him on the topic so this is only a guess, but I venture that he doesn't care if those personal liberties are threatened in this country or another. He is in favor of defending them.

which example

Still waiting.

You are not in favor of personal liberties then. You do understand that you can't compare a public safety issue with the harmless use of one's own property.

Their

I have news for you. It's still a choice. Laws can't change that. But that's neither here nor there. You are an anti-choice zealot.

Absolutely

Calling people ignorant because you can't address any of the issues directly is a pretty silly way to convince people you're views are the correct ones.

BTW, if God didn't appoint a Gestapo to enforce his precepts, why are you so concerned with forcing people to use their property in a way you see fit? Why not just give them the choice and let the market decide who has a business worth patronizing?


Your Ad Here

List | Previous | Next