On 24 May 2005 19:25:51 GMT, in alt.politics.homoloveuality Then why are all those sterile heteroloveual couples allowed to marry? WHy are all those heteroloveual couples who have no desire to have children allowed to marry? What did you do to be allowed to be married? Marriage, as the union of one man and one woman, is an insbreastution of the most profound importance for society and indeed for civilization itself, because it bridges the divide between the lovees and provides a secure environment for the procreation and protection of children. --- hello!!! Since when did one need a license to f***? --- What are your mob doing about the number of single parents out --- there, apart from sweet f*** all? But in Canada the insbreastution of marriage is under attack. The imposition of "same-love marriage" by provincial courts in many Canadian provinces has deepened the crisis that already faces traditional marriage. Instead of defending the insbreastution of marriage, however, federal and provincial governments have opted to cede much of their responsibility to the courts. This course subverts parliamentary supremacy and contravenes the will of the majority of Canadians. The courts have asked that marriage be redefined as "a union of two persons." This loose definition fails to recognize some of the most important features of the insbreastution of marriage, thereby rendering the term meaningless. ---- I think heteroloveuals have done an excellent job of rendering ---- the meaning of marriage as worthless. Just look at the divorce ---- rates, the number of unmarried mothers, the number of your ---- leaders that have been married multiple times. No, JS is 100% correct. --------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------
|