fictional claims: No proof offered ? Claim fails. See " precedent ", and, in Canadian legal processes, " convention ". Error. See above. The CAPABILITY to offer a mother AND a father. ANY heteroloveual couple qualifies. NO gay couple qualifies. No single person, gay or straight, qualifies. Wiggle on this pointed hook all you want, yet your denials mean... jack squat. The history of marriage IS what it IS. Period. Non sequitur. People who are UNQUALIFIED to marry have AbZero QUALIFICATION to state what marriage " should be ". That is the " relationship-centric ", IOW, narcissistic view of marriage. History shows that it is NOT accepted by any majority of people, either then or now. See the 11 states that strongly voted DOWN gay " marriage ", last November. Democracy is great ! And, as NO gay couple can fulfil those *responsibilities*, they fail to *qualify* for the right that comes with said qualification. QED. Irrelevent. They CANNOT meet the relevent qualifications. No proof offered ? Claim fails. No proof offered ? Claim fails. Refusing to give any group or person *that which they fail-refuse to qualify for*, is not " hating " anyone. This is an old whore of a fallacious and self serving LIE of gay " advocates " and lying Feminists. Now, you clearly hate straights. Because you demand that we give you, for free, without strings, what WE have to EARN and keep earning. Thats your gay anti straight bigotry talking. HTH. Andre -- " I'm a man... But, I can change... If I have to... I guess. " The Man Prayer, Red Green.
|
