Note: No response. Show me where it is a requirement that married couples have children, then. Show me where it is a requirement for each child to have a mother and a father. Show me where it is a requirement for each child to be raised by their biological parents. Your claim fails. That's not a requirement or a qualification of marriage. Do try again. Irrelevant, as there is no such requirement for marriage. The "history" of marriage is immaterial. If tradition was a valid argument, we would still have slavery and women wouldn't be allowed to vote. Sic sequitur. That's how many straight married people feel. Especially in Mbuttachusetts. Not at all. It's illogical to impose gender restrictions on who can enter into a legal contract with each other. Doesn't matter. The majority cannot vote away the rights of the minority. All that gays need to do is get a case to the Supreme Court and there will be same-love marriage in the US. Any gay couple can fulfill those responsibilities. Of course they can. You're the one who hasn't offered proof that homoloveuals cannot meet the qualifications. Therefore, your claim fails. See your post for proof. However, you have failed to show that the civil right of marriage should be withheld from same-love couples. Nope. But do try again. Clbuttic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. And what would that be? Prove that I am gay. -- Lurlean Lie #41: "Straight people signs the queer agenda too a lot of the time."
|
