wrote in message In your opinion. But not in the opinion of judges who are ruling otherwise. The judges did away with the laws that excluded them against the will of the majority. Just like what will happen with any anti-same-love marriage laws. Which people have been doing repeatedly in the courts. No we don't. We don't need society to rubber stamp it any more than two business partners need society to rubber stamp their arrangement. I've given you reasons. Reasons that judges are taking seriously. I haven't cited any law that these judges are writing. They're overturning unjust laws, not writing them. Consbreastutional law. That's their job. Thanks to conservatives changing the laws, there is now a dearth of laws that do not prohibit same-love marriage. But those laws will eventually be overturned. Loving vs. Virginia set the precedent for the judges to rule. That's all they need. Look up the word "sancbreasty". And despite your denial, there is a separation of church and state. What Happened To This Group 1705Check it out, poo for brains: "One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mbutt destruction and the missiles to deliver them... Because it's the truth. I know. I answered that. Sorry, but it is exactly the point. Your denial isn't going to change that. -- Funny Lurlean quote #37: "In our church we can travel thru space and time during our fire baptisms and spirit journey's." --Lurlean gives new meaning to the phrase "spaced out."
|
