Bill Baker It's not denied. It's simply not included. The burden is on you to prove why it should be. Still waiting..... n? None of them involve getting a license from the state. But that wasn't the question. The question is, why don't they involve getting a license from the state? You have yet to prove otherwise. You're the one who brought it up. Prove those judges are acting in accordance with the law. Those simply define marriage. Same-love unions aren't included for much the same reason as those who ride bicycles aren't included the list of persons requiring a license to drive. Now we're on the same page. Sigh. They are if they want it to be a bicycle rider's license. Homoloveuals aren't prohibited from getting a license to marry someone of the opposite gender just as bicycle riders are not prohibited from getting a license to drive a motor vehicle. Do you get it now? Ah, the idea that someone who can't provide one citation to prove anything he says isn't going to take me seriously just makes me want to yawn. No it isn't. Still waiting. Not in the context in which you meant. Thank you. No, they are not. Sure there does. The state doesn't deny the contract between the two parties. There's just no reason for the state to be a party to the contract.
|
