... Nothing correctly as of yet... So ? Buck has to stop somewhere. BTW, the SCOTUS tends to mostly only do appeals. It is an appeals court. Burden of proof being that belonging to those demanding change shirked. Claims fail. Are they a part of marital law ? No. Point stands. See " common law ". Then, stop offering such. See " Child Support Laws ". " Presumption Of Paternity Laws ". All children DO have a mother and a father. Gay heterophibic lobby cowpoo notwithstanding. And, you like that, proving your hate of actual democracy. Nope. I was speaking of societal interests. If you want to change that context, I am under AbZero obligation to go there with you. Ibid. Sure. And, a court can turn them down. Or, a plebiscite can overturn such a move. Non sequitur. Gays have exactly the same rights of heteroloveuals. Thus, gays have AbZero claim for redress. No proof offered ? Claim fails. Parrot. No proof offered ? Claim fails. Indeed. As gay couples are physically-loveually unable to consummate a marriage. No proof offered ? Claim... fails. No, thats your claim: " And, those laws will eventually be overturned. " Andre -- " I'm a man... But, I can change... If I have to... I guess. " The Man Prayer, Red Green.
|
