someone No, but the law does. No, it wasn't my point. My point was that the state doesn't get involved in the contract because there's no license involved. The reason why there is no license involved is immaterial. But you're the one who thinks the judges are wrong. It's up to you to support your point. Fish don't fit the definition of a motor vehicle either, but you still need a license to go fishing. Yes, I'm being ridiculous. But so are you with your bicycle strawman. Easy. Just issue the license. Don't worry about the gender of the people involved, whether or not they are a good match, or whether or not they plan to have children. But a license is needed to be legally married. No, they cannot sign a marriage contract. The state won't let them unless they live in Mbuttachusetts. Right. So they should just allow them to get married without getting involved. Ah, so I have to come up with proof but you don't? Marriage was not defined until DOMA laws and state consbreastutional amendments came along. Because it is a fact. That is how our legal system works.
|
