Slant.org
 
  NYC.General Newsgroups archive
 

 



Parents, Male Homoloveuals Prey On Your Boys 1678

Your Ad Here


Parents, Male Homoloveuals Prey On Your Boys 1679
Andre Lieven No proof? Claim... fails. So we're back to proving that the Supreme Court is wrong. Can you do it? That has already been provided by the cases that have come before the judges...

Heterophobe? Bigot? LOL Straight from the Sir Marksman School for the Confused. Now, you tell me: The above conversation is VERBATIM from your postk, as quoted by my newsreader. You then wrote, "No, because, once again, you DISHONESTLY *changed* what I said." It is obvious to anyone who can read that not one word was changed. So why do you charge that something WAS changed? Then you spoke of "context." You said, "I spoke of a CAPABILITY, NOT a necessity that it MUST always be used." What you choose to miss that all I attributed to you was CAPABILTY. Quote: "Where in the law is marriage defined as being only for those who are CAPABLE (emphasis added) of having kids?" You then replied, "See Family Law and Family Courts." I then asked, "Are you seriously claiming that marriage is defined by "family law" and "family courts" as being only for those who are CAPABLE (emphasis added) of having children?" You then started in on your riff about me changing your post and context. As is clear from the above, I changed nothing. If you want to play these Marksman-like games, I have no time for you. I have no time for Marksman either, but it is fun to once in awhile show the world yet again what he is made of. Now, if you want to debate points and opinions, great, bring it on.

Your Ad Here

List | Previous | Next