doesn't know how much she lied: *Qualification* topic there. Whicvh YOU changed to that of " capable of HAVING " children. The *capability to provide a mother AND a father* does NOT demand that a couple issue a child of their own biology. It doesn't even demand that they MUST adopt. Just that IF they do either, they CAN offer a father AND a mother. Its YOUR FALLICY that CHANGES my view to a DEMAND that heteroloveual marrieds MUST use that capability. They do NOT HAVE TO use it, they NEED only HAVE it. Duh ! Extraordinary claims ( Such as yours ) require extraordinary PROOF. As yet, you have offered ABZERO proofs and-or cites. Indeed. I spoke of heteroloveual CAPABILITIES that were innate to marriage, and you claimed that my view was that heteroloveual marrieds MUST use those capabilities. See above. That was YOU LYING about what I said. Because YOU changed the topic, from my speaking of CAPABILITY to your Straw Woman of MUST DO... Indeed. Thats your change, you loon. Married people DON'T have to have a child. They just need to be ABLE to offer ANY child, a mother AND a father. DUH ! LIE. Thats twice then, that you claim that you're " done " with me. Two more LIES... IOW, you admit that you're a TROLL. That helps explain your utter INABILITY to refute-debate what I actually write. Gay " marriage ": A special interest demand from heterophobic bigots who demand a privilige that they REFUSE to qualify for. Prove that a gay couple can provide a mother AND a father from WITHIN the couple. You cannot. Thus, any and all claims for gay " marriage "... FAIL. HTH. Andre -- " I'm a man... But, I can change... If I have to... I guess. " The Man Prayer, Red Green.
|
