Accurate people often are. Deal with the correct *and unrefuted* answer. No proof offered ? Claim fails. As has been noted, courts cna be... wrong. One that stands the test of time would be sufficient. As marriage predates the notion of civil rights by millennia, its clear that the one is well and truely independent of the other. So, post that proof. Many people end up in front of Supreme Courts for many reasons. Its a legally recognised relationship, in which the state can set standards of behavior between the involved parties, and *it certainly well includes issue of parenthood*. No proof offered ? Claim... fails. " Ad Hominem; The last refuge of the fact free scoundrel. " Proof that marriage is a " basci civil " right offered ? None, thus claim fails. Different issues, thus different results. Any adult human qualifies for the right to vote. Any adult human qualifies to marry a person of the other love. Thats... *equal*. But, equal is NOT what gay lobbyists want. Proof that marriage is a civil right ? None, thus claim fails. Ibid. Failed the test regarding fallacies, eh ? Indeed. Analogies work when like is compared to like. Race and loveual oriantation, *in terms of qualifying to marry*, are NOT like. Thus, purile and fallacious anology fails. Andre -- " I'm a man... But, I can change... If I have to... I guess. " The Man Prayer, Red Green.
|
