Keep it up, the fact of your lack of proof is still there. In some jurisdictions. But, as not a few regs have moved very far away from the actual best interests of a child, that gays want to use children as badly as single-by-choice moms isn't really news. Fallacy: Expecting society to be 100% consistant. In the face of competing special interests, this often isn't the case. Indeed: Yours. Saying it doesn't make it be so... Excellent ! In which case, as 98% of US states outlaw gay " marriage ", the " law is as it stands ". Not yet... That most jurisdictions still recognise that need of a child's, is why such flawed adoption policies are also on the line for tightening. The wedge was allowing single-by-choice mothers to do the same sort of harm to children. Claiming a " right " to match them in their pathology is hardly a " progressive " position. But, since it's all that you have... Try pbutting kindergarten for once... Andre -- " I'm a man... But, I can change... If I have to... I guess. " The Man Prayer, Red Green.
|
