Absurd. The basic principle of damage control, as well as the hypocratic oath, both express the idea that, first, do no ( more ) harm. While I do agree that untrammeled divorce and single-by-choice mommyhood are serious problems, they will NOT be allievated by ADDING a new PATHOLOGY. That is simply *your call* for more *license*. Once again, you display a shocking, though common from the " gimme, gimme ! " crowd, degree of illiteracy. Marriage contains the basic qualification of creating AND-OR ( Can you read that suffiently to note that in the case of one AND-OR the other, the lack of EITHER one is OK, but the lack of BOTH isn't ? ) raising children. Gays can do NEITHER. The sole issue of biological procreation is not *in of itself* enough to disqualify EITHER a heteroloveual or a gay couple. One then proceeds to the second qualification: The ability to provide any child brought into the marriage with a father AND with a mother. As gay couples CANNOT do that, EITHER, they fail BOTH qualifications, while a sterile heteroloveual couples PbuttES qualification #2. Thats the difference. Want to Live in the Third World 1 attachmentbegin 644 #19 NYC or Guatemala.jpg M'"$Q,3$Q,3$Q,3$Q,3$Q,3$Q,3$Q,3$Q,3$Q,3$Q,3$Q,3$Q,3$Q,3... Ibid. No, thats you. You claim that gays qualify for marriage, yet you CANNOT show what specific qualifications you claim they meet, aside from two warm bodies. Based on that, why not marry your two cats ? Andre -- " I'm a man... But, I can change... If I have to... I guess. " The Man Prayer, Red Green.
|
