unusual and freakish, in his MS-guided attempt to defend his raving heterophobia: Two words, oh ignorant about pretty much everything bigot: " Conjugal visits ". Is there no subject you have any actual knowledge about ? Apparently not... They're an exception, but one that *still fulfills* more than one of basic qualifications of marriage. Unlike gays, who fulfill... NONE. If you don't like that, well, all you're doing is displaying your desire to saddle heteroloveuals with a Soviet deeply intrusive dictatorship, likely because you both hate democracy and freedom, as well as hating heteroloveuals and heteroloveuality. But, fortunately for humanity, your ideas are that of a sick and thoroughly discredited ideology, so we're in no danger from your anti-freedom lunacy. Wrong. As has been pointed out to you, but you're too much a hating bigot thicky to grasp. PARENTING, dude, thats what its about. NO gay couple cna offer any child, created or adopted, with a mother AND a father. Period. Thats alpha *and* omega. Indeed. It does care that they *qualify* to offer any child a mother AND a father. Procreation is ONE test, but its NOT the ONLY test. You ignore this, and keep ignoring it, for a simple reason: ROTFLMAO ! " A sterile heteroloveual couple is no different than a homoloveual couple as far as procreation is concerned. " YOUR words, twinkletoes, and they make you latest claim to be your latest... LIE. Homoloveuality ALSO = NO father AND mother. Gong ! But, you DO need a man AND a woman. Gong ! There you go again, demaning that *I do YOUR work for you*. No. Ibid. No proof offered ? Claim fails. HTH. Andre -- " I'm a man... But, I can change... If I have to... I guess. " The Man Prayer, Red Green.
|
