Where are your peer reviewed, facts in support of gay " marriage " ? Excatly ! None at all, not even a bare bones cite. So, as you have offered AbZero cites, I have AbZero to refute ! No proof offered ? Claim fails. Why Higher Standards for the U.S. 1622slim Are you living under a rock that you don't already know this?? Its a simple 8 step process: 1. Saddam and his regime leaders were arrested. 2. Temporary government is... Another 2 for 1 of fallacies. How... typical for your side. No proof offered ? Claim still. fails. And, its incorrect, in any case.As John McKay write in " Divorcing Marriage ", " The historic definition of marriage as 'the voluntary union for life of one man and one woman, to the exclusion of all others' (1) contained in Hyde VHyde & Woodmansee, was thought to be self evident, at least 'in Christendom'. " 1) " ' I conceive ', wrote Lord Penzance ( 1866 L.R. 1 P. & D. 130, at p. 133 ), " that marriage, as understood in Christendom, may for this purpose be defined as the voluntary union of one man and one woman, to the exclusion of all others. ' Since then, marriage has come to be defined in common law as ' the lawful and voluntary union of one man and one woman to the exclusion of all others. " Then, your non existant books CANNOT ALSO prove anything. Thus, your side being the one demanding change, CANNOT prove that said change is non harmful to society, thus said claim for change must be rejetced due to it's claims being UNPROVABLE, as claimed by YOU. No proof offered for this claim that " two parent homes " gay and straight are functionally interchangable ? Claim fails. YOUR Straw Woman, play with her on your own time. Indeed. No proof offered ? Claims still... FAIL. HTH. Andre -- " I'm a man... But, I can change... If I have to... I guess. " The Man Prayer, Red Green.
|
