Don't even bother. I've cited the supreme court and two words later this Andre-poster forgets the whole thing and claims nobody ever presents any proof about marriage being a civil right thus it MUST BE an onerous burden instead with gazoolies of jump-this-hurdle requirements. Basically, Andre's idea of debate would go: 1: "TheBible". 2: "ForgottenChildren:StudiesofParentingbyGayParents by Aesop P Hulbutter" 1: "Oh yeah? Well, FourtyWinksWithMichaelJackson by Igot Nosleep" 2: "Try GayParents, a PFLAG resource, by Wanda Westwitch" 1: "SocietyandMarriage, by U. P. Tightareshole" 2: "RaisingChildrenWithoutDaddy, by Dross, Slime, and Kerput, 1993 edition" 1: "TheLastFamilyontheBlock by Crazycat Ladee" 2: "TheAnnotatedGarfieldColoringBook by Mythree Yearold" 1: "What does that have to do with it?" 2: "Read the book, dummy." 1: "TheRussiansareMakingYourKidsGay by Wildbutt Guess" 2: "TheBible" 1: "Hey! I cited that first." 2: "Read the whole thing. Something in there disputes you. Until then, you lose zero-to-one.' ad nauseum. And throw in the word "Ibid" where it doesn't make any sense a few times. Yeah. Like we've not asked for *that* before... -- The greatest and most important problems of life are all fundamentally insoluble. They can never be solved but only outgrown. --- Carl Gustav Jung
|
