Does it refute the specific points in my cited work ? Unlikely. Indeed. Yep. Its on my desk, right now. Already been done. No comment about your error reading that I did specify that they were the editors ? That level of error on your side makes less likely that your claims have any more merit than that. Rather late in the day. Now, ask all your compatriots in your demands for unearned priviliges, why they couldn't even do that little. As for the case for gay " marriage, it fails, for this reason: " So, heteroloveual involves much more than copulation. It is NOT merely a given of nature for straight people. It must be deliberately fostered and supported by a *distinct* culture and always has been. Most men and women will surely continue to copulate with each other, no matter what. Whether they will remain with each other and serve the larger needs of society, well, that is another matter entirely. " K. Young & P. Nathanson, " The Future Of An Experiment ", p. 47. What " larger need of society " does gay " marriage " serve ? None at all. Andre -- " I'm a man... But, I can change... If I have to... I guess. " The Man Prayer, Red Green.
|
