Pandering to the flake

Sounds like you're the flake pal.Why will you accept the fact that nerve damage from a prostate operation can cause ED but not nerve damage from a circumcision done at birth when the infant's privates is tiny and more vulnerable to damage than when a circumcision is done later in life? It's called bias pal. As a Jew(yes I know you're an atheist lol) you just won't even consider the idea that primitive circumcisions cause ED later in life( I didn't either). Everyone who lives long enough will eventually suffer from ED but you don't want to kiss 1-2 your active love life away by circumcision. You think that just because a man can function with 1-2 the nerves in his privates in his 20's and 30's and reproduce that it means circumcision is harmless. John Bobbit functioned fairly normally even after having his privates reattached but he was YOUNG. By a certain age you're going to need that 1-3 reserve of nerves that was removed by circumcision. When you're young you can get by with 1 lung or kidney. There's a reason we have 2. There's a reason a female has 2 ovaries. And there's a reason for the nerves in the double fold of skin of the privates. Ever wonder why Uprima which is highly thought of on an equal par with viagra in Europe is not successful in the US? The answer is simple and is probably the reason it was never marketed in the US (no it wasn't due to adverse effects). Uprima is a dopamine agonist which acts centrally but if you don't have the nerves (removed by circumcision) and more importantly the connections made in the developing infant's brain between the nerves and their corresponding area of the brain the drug is practically useless. Think about it and in fact tell your own doctor what I wrote and get his opinion.