jake Waskett No, Jake I don't. Circumcision And the many benefits... 551Dr. Lippooz You can say argued, mostly by anti-Semites. Sure, check Africa, comparing circumcise men versus those that weren't. certainly exist. at causes penile cancer... If you mean, do I see that you decided that they meant "routine" neonatal circs, rather than NON routine neonatal circs, then again, I don't see the difference. I understand you enjoy playing semantics to twist arguments to suit your point. However, I'd appreciate it if you'd please explain the difference between routine and non routine neonatal circs and what your evidence is for this convoluted argument. I don't think you know what they meant. I posted one of their conclusions from a link you posted. You cited another interpretation of the study, yet claim it is the same study. Why couldn't you find the point you wanted to make within the original link, but needed another interpretation of supposedly the same study, to make your point? Can't be, if you had to use two different links, to site the same study. Clearly, you didn't see what you wanted in the first link you posted, so you found one--on your website--that bolstered your argument. But medical costs are, Jake. That's an eight year old study, Jake. "Results. Fifty-eight percent (1768) of the questionnaires were returned" Hardly unanimous. Circumcision And the many benefits... 553Some really important facts... You'll see repeated the protection from urinary track infections, prevention in cervical cancer, woman with an uncircumcised mate have... "Of the respondents, 956 (54%) perform at least one circumcision per month...Of the physicians performing circumcisions, 45% use anesthesia" So this means that each doctor usee anesthesia less than half the time. How do they decide, flip a coin? Where did I write that? Yep. Yes it did. NYCTWU: Vote Until You Get It RightBEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 NYC-TWU: Vote Until You Get It Right Via NY Transfer News Collective * All the News that Doesn't Fit If you believe Roger isn't behind this I have... And o where did it claim those ailments were not universal: "Cost benefits of circumcision resulted from prevention of infant urinary tract infection, balanoposthitis, phimosis, HIV infection and penile cancer." No numerical qualifiers there, Jake. What? And again, what does that have to do with a study of children aged ten? How many loveually active ten years are there and how many have contracted HIV? How many ten year olds have PC? Yes. And what reason is there to believe they wouldn't be? And what reason is there to believe that they would all suffer from those ailments as the study implies? Statistically. Not universally as the study implies that all 14k were saved from these ailments because of RIC, rather than just the stasbreastically feasible. Are you a student, or do you own a business? Which one is it? Inflation and rising health care costs because of cuts to Medicaid, Jake.
|
