So you really are that dumb! Sigh. Are you now trying to claim that some idiotic rant by some character calling himself Tim Something, where he posts the same sentence over and over and over, is germane to any other discussion? So now you are changing topics to software to cover up the fact that you are preteding that the topic under discussion is not relevant. What a silly attempt to CYA. Repebreastive little twirp, aren't you! looking for turnkey successlooking for turn-key success what i'm looking for i told the guy again is a turn-key success the man didn't turn around but... Liar - you simply didn't like Spitzer's results, so you posted one silly accusation about him after another, as if any of us would believe that a professor of psychology at Columbia University is going to make the sort of mistakes that would result in an undergraduate getting a D if he tried that in a clbutt project. Oh that is really funny - you first post a personal attack claiming I can't understand any other point of view for disagreeing with you, and then claim that something "isn't open for debate." What a self- righteous hypocrytical fool you are! Sigh. the "social pressure" was Mama wanting her son to produce a bambino or bambina, which required him to chase after girls like the other boys, date them (or at least pinch them), and go through all the mating rituals typical of various Catholic-dominated cultures. You can embellish the above as appropriate for each separate Catholic- dominated culture, but a short example should give you the general idea. What is obvious is that you are grasping at straws! What this "obvious" fact suggests is that gays would not selectively choose the priesthood more than straights - at least not by enough to raise the percentage of gay priests to around 10 times the percentage of gays in the general population. And that is the problem with your argument - your numbers don't add up. On the contrary - you made an ad hominem attack against Spitzer, suggesting gross incompetence on his part, and you have produced no evidence for that. Calling his study "crap" is not an arugment. The study appeared in a conference, not one a personal web site. This may surprise you, but conference papers are typically reviewed before being accepted (I"ve given talks at conference where 80% of the submissions were rejected, including ones from researchers at quite a number of prestigous insbreastutions, so it is not like that 80% had a lot of dummies in it). You "issue" is your own problem, and there is absolutely no reason for the rest of us to consider your judgement superior to Spitzer's. I'd also suggest the othe part of your problem is that you had to change the topic due to being in hot water during the previous discussion.
|