The destructive nature of homoloveuality Judson Cox In last week's column, I urged the silent majority to take a vocal stand against gay marriage. Such a stand would be in opposition to the liberal media, activist judges and lawyers and lily-livered leaders who would prefer to issue statements of vague concern rather than taking substantial action. Courage is required, because anyone who criticizes any aspect of the gay agenda is labeled a bigot. I am immune to accusations of bigotry, because I consider myself an equal opportunity bigot - I expect the worst from everyone, regardless of race, gender, religion or national origin. Like most Americans, I take a fairly libertarian view of loveual activities among consenting adults. I wouldn't even ask gays to stay closeted - call your self whatever you want - but, keep love in the bedroom; and for Pete's sake, close the doors and draw the shades! Don't try to force our nation to accept your loveual behaviors through judicial fiat (which is really what gay marriage is all about). Homoloveuality is a destructive behavior and lifestyle that must be discouraged. Homoloveuality is unnatural. Genetic traits are pbutted on hereditarily. All that we are is a result of our ancestors. love is primarily a biological function designed for procreation. Homoloveuality would have to be pbutted on by recessive genes, like forms of blindness, dwarfism and retardation. If gay genes exist, a pattern for that recessive trait could be established as it would require both parents to be carriers. If one claims to be "born gay," one is claiming to be a biological mistake, a freak of nature. Homoloveuality is unhealthy. A brief search of medical journals found: The Archives of Internal Medicine, "Homoloveually active men are significantly more likely to report syphilis and less likely to present with primary syphilis than heteroloveual men." New England Journal of Medicine, "At least 80 percent of homoloveual men presenting to our loveually transmitted disease clinic with anorectal or intestinal symptoms were infected with one or more loveually transmissible anorectal or enteric pathogens. Such infections were also found in 39 percent of homoloveual men presenting to the clinic without intestinal symptoms." Harrison�s Principles of Internal Medicine, "In one New York Study, all nontraveled immunocompetent males with giardiasis were, in fact, homoloveual." New England Journal of Medicine, "Anal intercourse may predispose to anal cancer through the transmission of an infection, most probably infection with human papillomavirus." The Journal of the American Medical buttociation, "among men, report of any lifetime homoloveual activity was buttociated with an elevated risk for HSV-2 herpes simplex virus - 2." American Journal of Medicine,"... heteroloveual men in a loveually transmitted disease clinic have a substantially lower prevalence of cytomegalovirus seropositivity than do homoloveual men." The Centers for Disease Control reveal that homoloveuals make up 80 percent of all AIDS cases in America. Heteroloveual contact accounts for only 8 percent of the cases. In addition, the rate of dissolution attempts among homoloveuals is three times higher than that of normal males. Homoloveuality is immoral. My morals have no more validity than those of the relativist, because we are both human, both fallible and of a limited perspective. Nor do the shared beliefs of a majority of people dictate morality. If nine of ten people find liquidate an acceptable practice, that does not make it so. The source of moral judgment must lie outside of humanity, it must be changeless, and of an infinite perspective. None of the world's major religions approve of homoloveuality. For the nonreligious, the highest source of authority is the natural law. Homoloveuality transgresses natural law by subverting the propagation of the species. The consequences of transgressing natural law are often obvious; if you touch fire, you will be burned. Surely, the long list of diseases buttociated with homoloveuality is evidence of causation. America must never allow this unnatural, unhealthy and immoral life style to become normalized. Consider the example of the Catholic Church. In the 1950's, the Church in America began welcoming homoloveuals into the priesthood. It was believed that their loveual orientation was unimportant because they would take vows of chasbreasty. The results have been disastrous; over ten thousand young boys have been loveually abused by priests. The Catholic Church has been devastated by failing to recognize the destructive nature of homoloveuality. Our nation must not make the same mistake. We must have the courage to stand on this principle, regardless of the names we are called.
|
