No it is highly relevant. I described *what was reported* in the press, namely: 1. There were 36,700 entries in his notebooks. 2. A witnmess claimed he bragged about having love with children approximately that number of times and the police are trying to verify as much of this as they can. 3. The police figure that, even if 36,700 is a gross overestimate of how many times he abused children, it could still be one of the worst cases ever seen if not the worst. 4. The notbooks have some cryptic annotations that have not been decyphered. 5. The police would like any witnesses to contact them. 6. He should have been locked up a long time ago for a very long time, but the prosecutors in those previous cases did a poor job by not following the rules, leading to convictions being overturned. Whatever. You can go after windmills all you like, but don't pretend that I'm setting the windmills up for you. You have quite obviously been misrepresenting what I stated, as is pretty damn obvious from the example I gave of the text you snipped to change the meaning. And that is a fact.
|
