Did you read what I said - that he had 36,700 *entries* in a collection of notebooks (as reported by the police)? Nobody knows how many children he actually abused, but it really isn't very hard to count lines of text in a set of notebooks. All it takes is a few warm bodies to do the grunt work. We do know that a witness stated that the guy claimed to abuse 36000 kids. Maybe he did or maybe he just liked to brag to his pevert peers. It is, however, possible to pull of 1200 love acts in a year, since he would not have had to "get it up" for each one. He could not do that on his own but I imagine, if he had connections to a substantial number of other persons and was willing to pay sufficiently, he could get quite a supply of victims: all it takes is $$$$. Just because it is possible doesn't mean he actually was that prolific, but I'm sure the police and the DA can investigate it thoroughly enough to find out what actually happened. Is this *really* that hard for you to understand? Amd what is "fundy" about describing what was reported in mainstream newspapers?
|
