False Allegations By Females In The US

Melanie Phillips: LIES about rape.

Thirty million man-years in prison is a total shortened life expectancy of 15 million manyears, the equivalent of 205,500 lives.

Download this Excel Spreadsheet to see the raw figures from the UN.

To provide your opinion, click on "The Forum" here!

Why Do Women Lie About Rape?

The National Organization for Women, radical feminists and Women's Studies departments often deny that women make false accusations about rape by asking the naive, simplistic and self-serving question, "Why would a woman lie?" It turns out that there are plenty of reasons women lie about rape, either deliberately or out of desperation.

A U.S. Air Force study, The False Rape Allegation in the Military Community (1983), investigated 556 cases of alleged rape, and found a 60% rate of false rape accusations! As part of the study, women who were found to have made false accusations were asked "Why?"

Motivations Given by the Women Who Acknowledged They Had Made False Accusations of Rape

Reason Percent Spite or Revenge 20 To compensate for feelings of guilt or shame 20 Thought she might be pregnant 13 To conceal an affair 12 To test husband's love 9 Mental-emotional disorder 9 To avoid personal responsibility 4 Failure to pay, or extortion 4 Thought she might have caught VD 3 Other 6 Total 100

The study found that most false accusations are "instrumental" -- they serve a purpose. If the purpose isn't avoiding guilt or getting revenge, it might serve a more focused purpose, for example telling her parents "I didn't just go out and get pregnant - I was raped"; or telling her husband "I didn't have an affair; it wasn't my fault, I was raped."

An unrelated Washington Post article, "Unfounded Rape Reports Baffle Investigators" (6-27-1992) also found a wide range of motivations to falsely accuse men of rape. Anger towards boyfriends was common. One woman had her boyfriend spend 13 months in jail before she acknowledged that she lied. One woman accused her newspaper delivery man of raping her at gunpoint because she needed an excuse to be late to work. Neither woman was prosecuted or even reprimanded for lying to the police and attempting to have a man frivolously imprisoned.

All rape accusations need to be considered seriously as no doubt rape does indeed occur. But a balance needs to be maintained between the claims of the accuser against the all-too-often legitimate denial of the accused.

Women who are found to have made a false loveual buttault complaint should receive the same jail sentence as the male victim would have received if he had been convicted. That will put the brakes on fake rape.

AMERICAN MEN 15X MORE LIKELY THAN JAPANESE MEN TO BE ACCUSED IN 1980

All American jurists were aware that the UN reported the number of allegations of rape (which includes loveual abuse) in the US increased from 36,878 in 1970 to 82,088 in 1980, a shocking 123% increase in just that 10 years. At the same time, the number of allegations in Italy decreased to 1,844, and the number in Japan decreased to 2,610. At this point in our history, these American jurists should have been sounding the alarm that the *rate* of rape reports in the US was already 10 times higher than countries with similar cultures like Italy, and 15 times higher than Asian cultures like Japan (37.2 allegations per 100,000 population in the US, vs. 3.6 in Italy and 2.4 in Japan).

AMERICAN MEN 37X MORE LIKELY THAN ITALIAN MEN TO BE CONVICTED IN 1992

The Bureau of Justice Statistics' "love Offenses and Offenders", page v., reported that 15,158 American men received a prison sentence for loveual buttault (including rape) in 1992. It also reports that the average time served for such crimes was 48 months, which would have put 60,632 men in prisons for loveual buttault in 1992. But their "Inmate Survey" reports that 13% of the 711,000 state prison inmates in 1991 were sentenced for loveual buttault, which is 92,430 state prison inmates. There were another 505,665 Americans behind bars that year in jails and federal prisons in 1992, and if 13% of them were imprisoned for loveual buttault, then an additional 65,736 inmates (a total of 158,166 inmates) were behind bars for loveual buttault in 1992.

Where the BJS believes that only 60,632 American men were in prison for loveual buttault in 1992, and thus reports to the American public that our conviction rate for loveual buttault was "only" 6 per 100,000 population (a conviction rate already 14 times higher than Japanese or Italian or Greek men are convicted), 2.6 times as many inmates themselves reported in 1991 that they were imprisoned for loveual buttault. This would have required a conviction rate of 15.6 per 100,000 population, a rate already 37 times higher than Japan, Italy, or Greece.

If American men were actually no more violent than Japanese or Italian men in 1992, a completely reasonable expectation, and if our prison time served for loveual buttault was equivalent to the world average of two years rather than four years, then there would have been 1-37th as many American men in prison for loveual buttault as there were. This would have been 156,568 fewer prison inmates. In other words, we would have had 1,598 men in prison for rape, Japan would have had 780, and Italy would have had 464. Instead, we had 158,166, of whom 97,534 are being concealed by BJS statistics. Why did the BJS try so hard to conceal this data, and why were American men already more than 37 times more likely to be convicted of loveual buttault than in 1992 than Japanese, or Italian, or Indian, or Yugoslavian, or Danish men? Are they really that much more violent? It this at all possible?

"AMERICAN WOMEN 470X MORE LIKELY TO BE RAPED THAN JAPANESE WOMEN IN 1992"

Rather than taking the responsible course and warning the public that American men are at grave risk of being falsly accused by unscrupulous women who file numerous and multiple false charges, and rather than insisting that female criminals who lie be punished, our justice system instead embarked on a mbutt hysteria campaign to convince the world's women that rape is an under-reported crime. Hear how our Bureau of Justice Statistics responded to this alarming data:

WOMEN USUALLY VICTIMIZED BY OFFENDERS THEY KNOW

WASHINGTON, D.C. -- Women were attacked about six times more often by offenders with whom they had an intimate relationship than were male violence victims during 1992 and 1993, the Department of Justice announced today.

During each year women were the victims of more than 4.5 million violent crimes, including approximately 500,000 rapes or other loveual buttaults. In 29 percent of the violent crimes against women by lone offenders the perpetrators were intimates--husbands, former husbands, boyfriends or former boyfriends.

In other words, even though it had already stretched the imagination to believe that American men were 37 times more violent than Japanese men, it became the official policy of our once-trusted judicial system and well paid legal experts in Washington, D.C. that American men were actually another twelve times more violent than they were already being portrayed--making the American woman 470 times more likely to be raped than the Japanese woman.

FEMALE AMERICAN CRIMINALS ARE NOT PUNISHED

American women are constantly fed the subtle but clear message that they won't be questioned about the veracity of their charges, and that even if they were questioned, they wouldn't be prosecuted, and that even the remote possibility of prosecution wouldn't lead to any significant punishment. The inevitable result was that the US now distinguishes itself as the country with the lowest percent of prosecutions of women. Only 5% of all prosecutions in the US are against women, compared to 15% in most other countries:

OUR PRISON POPULATION ALMOST DOUBLES

By this process, false allegations of loveual abuse against men skyrocketed in the US since the 1980s, while they remained stable or even decreased in other countries. The US is the only country in the world whose prison population almost doubled in just one decade (between 1990 and 2000), which put a third of the world's prison population and two thirds of the world's loveual buttault convictions in the US, which has only 4.5% of the world's population. If the Inmate Survey is representative of today's prison population, then 13% or 260,000 of the 2 million men now in prison were convicted of loveual buttault. But crimes like property offenses, liquidate, robbery, buttault, and rape decreased between 23-47% during the time that the number of American men behind bars increased almost doubled. Because loveual buttault was conspicuously absent from the BJS website, the only way to explain the difference is a *POSSIBLE* 1,825% increase in imprisonment for loveual buttault. If true*, then 53.7% or 1,076,290 of the 2 million inmates were convicted of loveual buttault.