All Caused By Male Homoloveuals And IV Druggers 2212

Get your head out of your butt. Look around you. Remember all the loveual abuse done by the homoloveual priest in the Catholic church? Now the very same homoloveually dominated APA that says homoloveuals are "Alright" wants us to think the same thing about persons.

         *******

Is Pedophilia The Next "loveual Orientation" To Be Normalized

Washington, DC - The "loveual Orientation" lobbyists are at it again. In mid-May, members of the American Psychiatric buttociation (APA) met in San Francisco and listened to a psychiatrist argue for the declbuttification of paedophilia, fetishism, transvestism, voyeurism, and sadomasochism from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV-TR).

Dr. Charles Moser with San Francisco's Insbreastute for the Advance Study of Human loveuality (IASHS) and Dr. Peggy Kleinplatz with the University of Ottawa, presented a paper enbreastled: "DSM-IV-TR and the Paraphilias: An Argument for Removal." (Moser's IASHS is a Kinsey-based loveologist training group that approves of homoloveuality, loveography, sadomasochism, and other deviant loveual practices.)

Moser and Kleinplatz argued that these various loveual interests are culturally or religiously forbidden-and thus should not be considered mental illnesses. They claimed that because psychiatry has no baseline to determine what is normal or abnormal behavior, these loveual behaviors should no longer be stigmatized.

Over the past few years, the APA has done several flip flops on its position on pedophilia as a mental disorder. According to Linda Ames Nicolosi, the APA's DSM-III maintained that merely acting upon loveual urges against children is sufficient to earn a diagnosis of pedophilia.

****However, in the DSM-IV, the APA changed the definition. It claimed that only if a person experienced significant stress or social impairment, would his loveual attraction to children be considered pedophilia. In other words, if the person felt no remorse for molesting kids, he wasn't really a paedophile.*****

Is this really how the APA wants to define what is and isn't a mental disorder? If a person doesn't feel bad about his behavior, then he's normal. Using this definition, one could say that a person who feels no emotional discomfort from having love with dead people or animals is perfectly normal. Would APA psychiatrists argue that the homoloveual Jeffrey Dahmer was a normal person because he felt no remorse or social impairment for cannibalizing his love victims?

Has the psychiatric community gone insane? After bad publicity over this watered-down definition of pedophilia, the APA again flip flopped and issued a statement saying that pedophilia was morally wrong.

The debate, however, continues within the APA with the loveual Orientation lobbyists working feverishly to normalize what most rational humans would consider serious mental disorders and loveual dysfunctions.