Yep. I called you on it, and recieved abuse from you. " Ad hominem: The last refuge of the argument-free scoundrel. " So ? Did I make any claims about gays being " promiscuous ? No, as to my point, its *irrelevent*. Play with your straw women on your own time... No rebuttal ? My point stands. Thank you. I am saying that single parents BY CHOICE are poor parents, and the statistics back me up on that. Do not be so deluded to believe, fallaciously, that gay " marriage " is my only issue of concern. They're surely not BOTH parents. Duh. And, thats bad, too. One does not do good, by *increasing* the bad... Perhaps folks who repeatedly vote down gay " marriage" will also move to correct those wrongs. No proof offered ? Claim fails. Non sequitur. Gay men can marry any woman who will have them, *equally* to any straight man. Why gay " marriage is a matter of special privilige is that gays want the legal "right" to marry from 100% of the human pool, while neither straight people nor society want that, or derive any benefit from that. So, the claim that denying gays a special privilige is somehow a " violation of equal protection " is also specious. And, gays already have that. QED. Yep. As the Consbreastution does NOT state that anyone can marry anyone, regardless of love. Thus, appealing to it, is also specious. " Ad hominem: The last refuge of the argument-free scoundrel. " Non sequitur. As *I have already said*, a heteroloveual couple CAN offer an adopted child a mother AND a father. NO gay couple can do that. Period. You don't understand the concept of common law ? Too bad, so sad. ACLU sues for gays' benefits 1928Indeed. How dare anyone demand that your claims *live up to the standards* of all others... NO gay couple can provide a mother AND a father. Are you suggesting that... No proof offered ? Claim fails. Already done. No proof offered ? Claim fails. And, that should be stopped, too. No, *as I have already said*, an infertile heteroloveual couple CAN give an adopted child a mother AND a father, what NO gay couple can do. So, every time you make this failed appeal, you display your ignorance. Of a willful sort. No proof offered ? Claim fails. No proof offered ? Claim fails. The deepest argument you have yet offered... No proof offered ? Claim... fails. Utterly. As you offered NO cites at all, its clear that your claims are faith based, and NOT reason and fact based. I don't argue with fundamentalists. And, you are a gay " rights " fundamentalist, as you show by offering NO proof of ANY of your claims. Its been fun, oh fact free one, but I have work to do. Work that involves facts. Try it sometime. Buh bye. ACLU sues for gays' benefits 1927My claims that society will benefit from people getting married? I mean, on the one hand we've got the stuck-up stickybeaks saying gays are... Andre -- " I'm a man... But, I can change... If I have to... I guess. " The Man Prayer, Red Green.
|
