Slant.org
 
  NYC.General Newsgroups archive
 

 



ACLU sues for gays' benefits 1906

Your Ad Here


Point remains: As gay couples CANNOT provide a father *and* a mother from whitin the couple, they do not meet that qualifying test for the legal privilige of marriage. You have yet to offer ANY proof disputing

NO proof offered ? Claim fails.

WOMEN'S BREASTS #2
Also, no other creature has breasts but human females i.e. animals or even monkeys don't have them BECAUSE: those...

The issue is ability to meet the societal test of a married couple providing a mother AND a father for any child, be it theirs by blood or by adoption.

NO gay couple can ever do that. So, their " stability " is utterly irrelevent, as a " stable " home of bats would be equally UNABLE to provide a mother AND a father to any child.

NO proof offered ? Claim fails.

I define my position, " dumbbutt ".

NO proof offered ? Claim fails.

As I am NOT demanding a CHANGE is a societal insbreastution, I have AbZero burden to deffend it.

It is ALWAYS the claimants for the CHANGE who carry the burden of proof, " dumbbutt ".

Indeed: 100% one.

Since iut was YOUR CLAIM that gays " equal protection rights " are being violated by their being denied legal marriage, it is YOUR BURDEN to PROVE that marriage is covered by the US Consbreastution.

Since you CANNOT, your claim.... fails.

NO proof offered ? Claim, once again... FAILS.

Andre

-- " I'm a man... But, I can change... If I have to... I guess. " The Man Prayer, Red Green.

Your Ad Here

List | Previous | Next